Current Status of Comprehensive Examination and

  Thesis Requirements in Master of Accounting Programs

   

 

 

       By

   

Frank R. Urbancic, DBA, CPA

Professor and Chair

Department of Accounting

University of South Alabama

Mobile, Alabama 36688

 

        

  Current Status of Comprehensive Examination and

   Thesis Requirements in Master of Accounting Programs

 

 

ABSTRACT

  The master of accounting degree is based on a highly specialized professional program of graduate study with requirements that vary considerably among different institutions which offer the degree.  These requirements may address important education objectives, such as outcome assessment and integrative experience, through various approaches including, but not limited to, a terminal comprehensive examination and a thesis requirement or option.  The purpose of this paper is to provide comparative information concerning policies, practices and procedures with respect to terminal comprehensive examinations and thesis provisions for master of accounting degree programs.  The information is obtained from a survey of 243 institutions which offer a master of accounting degree.  Currently, 35 percent of these programs have a terminal examination and/or thesis, whereas 28 percent of the programs rely on other approaches, such as a capstone course, to provide students with a suitable culminating experience.  Findings from the study offer useful benchmarking information to educators for purposes of evaluating the requirements of an existing master of accounting program or for developing plans to establish a new program.

  Current Status of Comprehensive Examination and

   Thesis Requirements in Master of Accounting Programs

 

In response to 150-hour legislation enacted in recent years by a majority of States, many universities have developed  graduate programs for conferring a masters degree in accounting, and other universities have experienced increases in student enrollment among existing masters programs. In contrast to the MBA, the master of accounting degree is based on a highly specialized professional program with requirements that vary considerably among different institutions offering the degree.  These requirements may address important objectives, such as outcome assessment and integrative experience, using various approaches including, but not limited to, a thesis and/or terminal comprehensive examination.

The most obvious difficulty with a thesis or terminal examination requirement is the demand on faculty time for supervision and administration.  Nonetheless, requirements, such as a thesis, have a capability for improving the quality of a graduate program and providing a significant educational experience for students [Anderson and Usry, 1970].  Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine comparative data concerning the current state of thesis and terminal comprehensive testing as a component of nondoctoral graduate programs in accounting.  The study offers useful benchmarking information to educators for the purpose of developing new programs and for evaluating existing program requirements for the master of accounting degree.

The study is organized into five sections.  First, a review of related prior research is presented.  Second, the methodology for the study is described.  The third and fourth sections present results of the study along with a discussion of the principal findings for terminal comprehensive examinations and thesis requirements and options.  Finally, concluding observations and comments are offered in the fifth section.

Related Research

One of the earliest views on theses and comprehensive examinations in masters programs for accounting was put forth by a special committee of the American Accounting Association in 1970.  Without providing an accompanying explanation or justification, the seven-member committee included the following brief statement in its report on graduate accounting programs:

No thesis requirement or comprehensive examination is recommended. On the other hand, it is expected that courses will require supervised research in order that a student receives adequate instruction in writing and research methodology.[Patrick, 1970, p. 51]

The aforementioned position contradicts previously published studies of the master thesis and terminal examination in other fields.  For example, based on a survey of 31 students enrolled in an accredited master of social work program, Corcoran (1984) reported that a master thesis was perceived to be a viable teaching tool, an effective method for enhancing specialization, and a valuable learning experience for students.  In an earlier study based on a survey of 41 schools offering a master of library science degree, Arnold and Bottle (1970) reported that 56 percent of the programs had a terminal comprehensive examination and that 29 percent had either a thesis requirement or option.  Furthermore, Arnold and Bottle emphasized that the integrative experience of a comprehensive examination helps contribute to the total educational development of the student, raises the standards for masters programs, and serves as an instrument for the betterment of librarianship as a whole. Finally, based on a survey of changes in a five-year period for 118 institutions offering masters degree nursing programs, McKevitt (1986) observed a significant increase in the number of programs with a terminal comprehensive examination and that the examination requirement had apparently become a means for more widely promoting program rigor.

In the area of graduate business education, previous studies of the terminal examination and/or thesis focused primarily on MBA programs.  Edwards and Pullis (1976-77) surveyed 115 accredited schools of business and observed a definite trend toward the elimination of formal written examinations, and also oral examinations as a component of MBA programs.  Edwards and Pullis attributed this trend to insufficient faculty resources, excessive demand on faculty time, and the lack of a singular, generally acceptable purpose for the examination.  Brown and Parker (1985) reported a similar finding based on a survey of 60 business school deans, wherein only 32 percent of the respondents claimed to have a comprehensive examination requirement for their MBA programs.  As a compromise position, Brown and Parker recommended that MBA programs incorporate a capstone course which includes an integrative examination as a means for students to apply the knowledge they gained from their course work.  In a study of outcome assessment procedures for MBA programs, Edwards and Brannen (1990) surveyed 657 business educators to determine the use of and the attitudes toward pre-admission, interim and terminal testing.  Regarding terminal comprehensive examinations, Edwards and Brannen found that 75.4 percent of the MBA programs had no such requirement, but for the programs that had terminal testing, it was most likely written, integrative in nature, and mandatory for all MBA candidates.  Finally, McCambridge and Thornton (1994) surveyed graduate program directors at 547 universities as a basis for determining the types of alternative approaches in use for providing MBA students with an integrative experience.  Their findings indicated that MBA programs most frequently had the following approaches to integration, either alone or in combination, a capstone course 91.7%, comprehensive exam 17.6%; thesis 14.5%, professional paper 10.9%, and/or internship 7.3%.  These observations led McCambridge and Thornton to conclude that MBA programs were becoming narrowly defined with respect to completion of a certain number of courses, one of which is a capstone course, and that most programs corresponded to little more than a fifth year of undergraduate study.

There is no previously published research on the use of comprehensive examinations for master degree programs in accounting.  However, an older study by Anderson and Usry (1970) addressed thesis policies for graduate nondoctoral accounting programs in the United States based on a survey of 247 colleges of business.  Anderson and Usry reported that a thesis option or thesis requirement was more prevalent among Master of Science and Master of Arts degree programs in accounting compared to other degrees, including MBA generalist and MBA with an accounting option.  For the MS and MA in accounting programs, 53 percent had a thesis requirement and 30 percent had a thesis option, whereas for all other types of graduate business degree programs, 22 percent had a thesis requirement and 40 percent had a thesis option.  Other findings from the study concerned the specific objectives and the process for masters theses in accounting, from which the following conclusion was made:

 However, effectively done, masters theses or reports are an expensive form of instruction which will flourish only to the extent that accounting educators and administrators agree on the desirability of research experience and adopt efficient and effective means of supervision... Still we remain convinced that personal research experience is the best teacher, well worth the cost and effort. [Anderson and Usry, 1970, pp. 583-584].

Results from the Anderson and Usry study of the thesis component for graduate accounting education are thirty years old, and research concerning terminal comprehensive examinations for master degree in accounting programs has not been previously published.  Therefore, the current study is intended to improve the available information in both of these areas.  Also, the study excludes MBA programs so that the focus is solely on master of accounting (MAcc) degree programs.  The scope of the study includes policies for thesis options, thesis requirements and terminal comprehensive examinations.  The method used for the study is described in the next section.

Method

A questionnaire (included as Appendix A) was used to obtain information about MAcc programs.  The questionnaire had five sections.  The first section contained general information questions.  The second section had questions concerning terminal comprehensive examinations.  The third section was devoted to thesis questions.  The fourth and fifth sections were for reasons why a terminal comprehensive examination, and/or a thesis requirement or option are not part of a MAcc program.

A list of the institutions that offer a MAcc program was developed from information provided in Petersons (1999) guide to graduate study.  A total of 243 programs were identified for the survey and questionnaires were sent to academic accounting program administrators.  There were 105 questionnaires returned including two that were incomplete.  The remaining 103 useable questionnaires represent a 42.4 percent response rate.

Exhibit 1 presents enrollment information provided by the respondents for their institutions.  At the university level most enrollments were between 5,000 and 20,000 students, with 50,000 the largest and 2,000 the smallest student enrollments.  Business college enrollments range from 7,000 to 250 students, but most are 2,500 students or less.  The degree title for the MAcc program is usually Master of Accountancy (34) or Master of Science in Accounting (28) and nearly half of all programs enroll 30 or fewer students.  The largest MAcc program has 325 students, whereas two of the programs currently have no students enrolled.

Additional information provided by the respondents for their institutions is presented in Exhibit 2.  According to the exhibit most of the universities are public (77) rather than private (26). A majority (91) of the respondents are associated with institutions accredited by the American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business, including 32 business accreditation only, and 59 business accredited with separately accredited accounting programs.  Nearly all (94) of the universities have a semester credit hour system.  Almost half (45) of the semester based MAcc programs consist of 30 credit hours to complete the degree including 15 to 21 credits in courses exclusively devoted to accounting, auditing, systems or tax.

Terminal Comprehensive Examination

Exhibit 3 provides an overview of certain requirements for completing the MAcc degree.  According to the exhibit, 23 MAcc programs have a terminal comprehensive examination and 21 programs include a thesis provision.  In contrast,38 MAcc programs have no special requirements aside from the completion of courses.  Additionally, 29 programs have, as an alternative to a terminal examination or thesis, other requirements such as a capstone course, research paper or a project.  In the paragraphs of the current section, only the MAcc programs that have a terminal comprehensive examination are discussed further.

Exhibit 4 presents the survey results for 23 programs that have a terminal comprehensive examination.  The most frequently mentioned reasons for including an examination as part of the program are to fulfill a graduate school requirement (7) or to serve as an outcome assessment procedure (7).  In a majority of cases (19) there are no plans to eliminate the examination within the next three years.

Concerning the examination, Exhibit 4 indicates that it is more likely to be a written exam (15) than oral (8), usually two to four hours in length (13), and covers only the core courses in accounting (16) rather than all the courses comprising the degree (7).  According to the exhibit there is considerable variation in the format for the examination since many programs incorporate two or more different types of questions in the examination, including essay (12), discussion question (12), short answer question (7), case analysis (6), and multiple choice questions (2).  The aforementioned variations in format are indicative of the difficulty encountered in the development of a satisfactory examination for comprehensively testing students on material from several courses taught by different faculty.  Other findings reported in Exhibit 4 are that a student usually has a maximum of two attempts (13) in which to pass the examination, and that failure can result in dismissal from the program (6).

Although a terminal comprehensive examination may offer benefits such as a means for outcome assessment or an integrative experience, the results presented in Exhibit 4 indicate that the development and administration of a terminal examination is a very imperfect process.  Examinations for some MAcc programs are written while others are oral.  Time lengths for the examination range from a half-hour to in excess of five hours.  Also, examinations often contain different question formats in an assortment of combinations.  The extent of these variations raises some doubt concerning the underlying validity of the terminal examination process.  Moreover, nearly half of the programs (10) have no established policies in the event that a student fails the examination or a repeat examination.  This finding suggests the possibility that examinations tend to be graded liberally to ensure that virtually every student passes.  Therefore, not surprisingly, the information presented in Exhibit 3 indicates that more than three-fourths (80) of MAcc programs do not have a terminal comprehensive examination. These programs are discussed next.

Respondents were asked to provide reasons why their MAcc program does not have a terminal comprehensive examination.  Of the 80 programs without a terminal examination, one-third of the respondents (26) offered no explanation, but the remaining 54 respondents provided one or more reasons. The list of reasons are presented in Exhibit 5.

Several of the reasons listed in Exhibit 5 lack sufficient strength as a basis for excluding a terminal examination.  First, other master of accounting programs do not have an examination requirement (7) is invalid as a reason because it makes an assumption that all MAcc programs have identical admission standards, instructional quality, and course rigor.  Second, it is not appropriate for a professional degree program (7) ignores the fact that masters programs in other professional fields have comprehensive examinations.  Third, the CPA examination adequately serves as an exit measure (5) is invalid as a reason for its assumption that every MAcc student will sit for the CPA exam.  Fourth, the MBA program has no such requirement (5) makes an inappropriate comparison between the MAcc, which is a specialist degree program, and the MBA, which is a generalist degree program.  Other reasons listed in Exhibit 5 are unsupported, and include: it would not add value to the program (5); it is not useful (4); and the costs exceed the benefits (3).

In contrast to the aforementioned weak reasons, there are five reasons presented in Exhibit 5 which have merit for the purpose of excluding a terminal comprehensive examination.  First, the statement, it is too time consuming to develop and administer (9), is probably true given the size of some MAcc programs.  According to Exhibit 1, 28.2 percent of all MAcc programs have in excess of 50 students, including several programs that enroll more than 100 students.  Second, the courses are sufficiently rigorous (9) recognizes that concerted efforts to uphold quality control throughout a program are more important than reliance on a single exit point quality control check, such as a comprehensive examination.  Third, a capstone course is sufficient (7) constitutes a strong reason for omitting a terminal examination since a capstone course can provide a more extensive integrative experience throughout an entire semester in contrast to a single examination of a few hours in length.  Moreover, an examination can be included as part of the capstone course requirements and thereby facilitate outcome assessment.  Finally, two additional reasons, it is difficult to develop a valid examination (6) and it is a superficial requirement since no one ever fails (4), are consistent with insights offered earlier in this section.  Finally, it should be noted from Exhibit 5 that 78 of the 80 respondents indicated it is unlikely that a terminal examination will be added to the requirements for a MAcc degree at any time in the next three years.

Thesis Requirement or Option

There has been a substantial decrease in the presence of a thesis component in MAcc programs since the time of the study by Anderson and Usry. In 1970, 53 percent of the MAcc programs surveyed had a thesis requirement and 30 percent had a thesis option.  However, the results presented in Exhibit 3 indicate that only 2.9 percent (3) of MAcc programs currently have a thesis requirement and 17.5 percent (18) of the programs have a thesis option.  Respondents for the 21 programs with a thesis requirement/option were asked to provide primary reason(s) for including a thesis as part of the MAcc program.  According to Exhibit 6, respondents gave various reasons for inclusion of a thesis requirement/option as part of the MAcc program, with development of research experience (9) mentioned the most often as a reason.  However, when asked to select the most important benefit to students as a result of the thesis experience the respondents selections were almost evenly divided between development of self-study or research skills (11) and increased knowledge of a specific topic in accounting, auditing systems or tax (10).

Results presented in Exhibit 6 indicate that students are usually awarded either three or six semester hour credits upon successful completion of a thesis.  A thesis is optional for 18 of the 21 MAcc programs that have a thesis component, but the option is rarely chosen (usually fewer than 10 percent of all students).  Although there is no dominant research method (10) used by thesis students, several respondents mentioned that library/secondary source (6) and survey (4) are popular methods.

Additional findings presented in Exhibit 6 indicate that faculty supervisory responsibility for thesis is fulfilled by either a committee of faculty members (12) or an individual faculty member (9).  The size of most thesis committees is three faculty members (9).  Thesis supervision imposes a significant time commitment on faculty, but 81 percent (17) of the programs have no provision to adjust faculty teaching load.  Concerning the future status of the thesis component, most respondents (18) anticipate its retention as a requirement or option, including one program that is expected to change from a thesis option to a thesis requirement.

Although a thesis may offer benefits such as a means for integrating knowledge from the total MAcc curriculum and as a process for a student to develop specialization in an area of accounting, the size of student enrollment for many MAcc programs is simply too large for effective thesis supervision by faculty. For example, collectively the 103 respondents reported that their MAcc programs have 5,171 students enrolled, or an average of 50.2 students per program.  Accordingly, 79.6 percent (82) of the MAcc programs have no thesis component.  These programs are discussed next.

Respondents were asked to provide reasons why their MAcc program does not have a thesis component.  Nearly 30 percent of the respondents (24) offered no explanation, but the remaining 58 respondents provided one or more reasons.  The list of reasons is presented in Exhibit 7.

Exhibit 7 lists eight specific reasons provided by respondents to explain why their MAcc program has no thesis component.  Similar to the previous discussion in the section for terminal examinations, several of the reasons are insufficient as a basis for omitting a thesis, including other master of accounting programs do not have a thesis (6), it provides no benefit (5), it would not add value to the program (2), and the MBA program has no such requirement (2).  Also invalid as a reason, is the one most frequently mentioned by the respondents (25), that a thesis is not relevant for a professional practitioner oriented degree. Self-study and lifetime learning ability are essential skills for accountants.  Therefore, to some extent, a thesis can offer a beneficial experience for students entering the profession of accounting.

In contrast to the aforementioned weak reasons, there are three reasons presented in Exhibit 7 that have merit for the purpose of excluding a thesis component.  First, the courses contain sufficient research and writing assignments (15) suggests that there is a viable alternative to a thesis component.  Thesis research is generally different than the research tasks typically confronted by accountants.  Research assignments within courses are potentially more effective than a single thesis as a means for improving the skills of MAcc students.  Second, it imposes too much of a time commitment on the faculty (8) coincides with information reported earlier that the average enrollment in MAcc programs is 50 students.  Given their large enrollments, a thesis component is impractical for most MAcc programs.  Finally, the statement, it imposes too much of a time burden on students (4), is undoubtedly true.  Therefore, courses that include short research assignments offer not only a more effective approach, but also a more efficient means for improving the skills of MAcc students.  Finally, it should be noted from Exhibit 7 that none of the 82 respondents indicated any likelihood of adding a thesis component to the MAcc program within the next three years.

Concluding Observations and Comments

According to information presented earlier in Exhibit 3, 65 percent (67) of MAcc programs have no thesis component nor terminal comprehensive examination.  Though a thesis and terminal examination facilitate integrative experience and outcome assessment, there are valid reasons for excluding them from the requirements for a MAcc degree.  However, adequate alternative measures should be taken to preclude the MAcc program from becoming nothing more than just an extended year of undergraduate study.

First, a capstone course deserves to be considered for inclusion in MAcc programs since such a course, if appropriately designed, has the potential to offer students a valuable culminating experience.  A capstone course helps students effectively integrate the knowledge gained from other courses in a MAcc program.  In addition to this integrative experience, the requirements for a capstone course can be designed to facilitate outcome assessment by including one or more relevant examinations.  These examinations could be structured to serve both as an exit point quality control check on students and as feedback for continuous improvement to the MAcc program.

Second, short research assignments throughout the courses comprising a MAcc program represent a useful alternative to the thesis approach in graduate education.  Assignments can be designed to cover issues that are similar to those a practicing accountant might typically encounter.  These assignments can help students gain valuable experience in planning for research, applying the methods of research, writing professionally, and meeting deadlines.

Finally, rather than including a thesis or terminal examination, a MAcc program which consists solely of courses alone can prove to be a sufficient basis for educating students on a level distinctive from their baccalaureate experience, provided the graduate faculty are dedicated to high quality instruction.  Faculty should challenge their MAcc students and expect far more from them in comparison to baccalaureate students.  The type and extent of material to be covered, the demanding nature of assignments to be completed, and fostering a competitive environment can collectively serve to enrich the educational experience for MAcc students.  In the absence of such rigor, a courses only based MAcc program offers nothing to distinguish it from a baccalaureate program in accounting except for a difference in admissions standards.

   CLICK HERE FOR EXHIBITS AND APPENDIX

(Use Microsoft Word to View)

References

   

Anderson, W. T. and Usry, M. F. (1970). Use of Theses and Reports in Masters Degree Programs.  Accounting Review, 45(3), 579-584.

Arnold, E. R. and Bottle, R. T. (1970).  Lets Get the Most Out of Comprehensive Examinations.  Journal of Education for Librarianship, 11(3), 111-117.

Brown, T. S. and Parker, S. (1989). Comprehensive Exams: Still a Useful Tool?  Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 4(2), 101-110.

Corcoran, K. J.(1984). Is There Educational Value in the Masters Thesis?  Journal of Education for Social Work, 20(3), 30-35.

Edwards, D. E. and Pullis, J. M. (1976-1977). Current Status of Terminal Examinations for the Masters Degree in Business. Collegiate News and Views, 30(2), 15-19.

Edwards, D. E. and Brannen, D. E. (1990).  Current Status of Outcomes Assessment at the MBA Level.  Journal of Education for Business, 65(5), 206-212.

McCambridge, J. and Thornton, B. M. (1994).  A Survey of Institutional Practices Concerning the MBA Integrating Experience.  Journal of Education for Business, 69(3), 163-166.

McKevitt, R. K. (1986).  Trends in Masters Education in Nursing.  Journal of Professional Nursing, 2(4), 225-233.

Patrick, A. W., Chairman. (1970).  Report of the Committee on the Masters Program in Accounting.  Accounting Review, 45(2), 45-51.

Petersons 1999 Graduate Programs in Business, Education, Health, Information Studies, Law and Social Work,33rd Edition, Princeton, New Jersey: Author.